Haven’t really checked on the Fukushima event through the eyes of Canada’s journalists. Went here.
They have pretty much what everyone else has. Hadn’t mentioned the “hot beef” report here yet. This is that report. First line:
Japan has found radiation above the legal limit in beef…
I’m willing to bet the radiation was detected outside the beef. From which we can infer that there’s something new inside the beef. That being the C-word, “That Which Must Not Be Named By Media”.
Because that would involve getting the story straight.
The health ministry said 510 becquerels of radioactive cesium had been detected in beef… about 70 kilometres from the plant — exceeding the 500-becquerel limit
510 bequerels, or 610 Bq, is 510 disintegrations per second. That’s not a limit, that’s half a limit. We need the rest. The “per unit mass” part. Is it “per kilogram” or “per gram”?
“Per cow”? I’m perfectly willing to eat a 510 Bq cow.
Also remember the possibility of false alarms. There was one at Brookhaven once, when unexpectedly high levels of Cs-137 in a deer turned out to be a lab error. If one cow 70km away is eating cesium grass, so are others.
Here’s two things you’d see, often, in this rapidly-changing situation. That is, if we had a rational and competent media:
“That initial report was confirmed by further testing.”
“Further investigation sshowed that the initial finding was in error.”
Seen much of that? Seen any of that? Wow. Journalists make no mistakes, it seems.
They have an article about high radiation 40km from the site. Actual readings would be nice. That 40km distance is familiar, I think. Elevated cesium found five centimeters deep?
Greenpeace this week said it had confirmed radiation levels in this village northwest of the plant high enough to evacuate.
Those radiation levels being…? Hmph. High enough for you to tell us to evacuate, but not important enough to tell us what they are.
We’re perfectly willing to consider your analysis, Greenpeace. When you share your data.