Dr. “No” explains the meaning of the word.

The only proper response to utopians is “No!”.  But that’s not to imply your message is for them.  They already hear “no” in everything but your humble, “as you command, master”.

You’re fighting for people who haven’t contracted Militant Narcissism.  “No!” is “everything they say is a lie!”  Of course, you have to prove it.  But that’s the easy part.    

What’s hard (for you social animals) is to seek the hatred of all those pretty, pretty people.  If you could do it en masse this war would be over.  Well, never over, of course.  (The idea that things can be settled permanently is utopian madness.)  But we might surpass all previous peace and freedom before the lesson is lost and utopians grow strong again…

Let’s say you’re “debating” Obama or any other Militant Narcissist.  Why attack his argument?  He doesn’t care about it, neither should you.   Remember, he is insane at the axiomatic level.  The only reason to argue with a crazy man is to benefit onlookers.  So attack his beliefs, where they first diverge from reality. 

Something like, “Mr. Obama claims to care about the poor and needy, but he is lying.” 

Now before proving that statement—which is simple—just imagine utopian anger.  They go nuts when their trivial errors are pointed out.  So why not turn the dial up to “11”?  Why not show the world that Militant Narcissists are everything they claim to hate?  Their polished deceit would turn into raging incoherence that drives their potential victims away.  And what’s the worst that could happen?

Well…assassination, of course.  You wouldn’t be in danger if ten million others joined you.  That would break the utopians for generations.  But a lone prophet?  A handful of people?  Point out their moral nakedness, keep doing it, and some will finally scramble to the last refuge of the incompetent.        

But that’s what it takes.

Oh, proving that Obama doesn’t care?  Easy. 

“We all know that Obama loves his daughters.  He does everything he can for their safety and prosperity.  Notice what he doesn’t do.  He doesn’t spend forty percent more than he makes, year after year after year.  Why?  Because he would go bankrupt someday and then be unable to support his girls.”

“When campaigning, Obama declared Bush’s deficit spending and debts ‘unpatriotic’.  He promised to cut spending, cut the deficit, rein in the debt .  He was elected on those promises and he broke every one.  He saves money for some.  But you, you he puts you deeper in debt with no plan to repay.  Because he doesn’t care.  He only pretends so that you’ll do what he wants.”

Posted in Militant Narcissim | Leave a comment

More on Utopian Zombies

Obviously I’m serious about the Left (along with half of “the Right”) being insane.  And zombies.  Crazy Zombies!

Of course “insane zombie” is a bit oxymoronic, with your “Classic Zombie” being mindless and all.  Utopians certainly aren’t mindless.  They’re not even brain-damaged, in the organic sense.  The problem is software, not wetware.  Militant Narcissists  uploaded malware for which they had no filter or anti-virus.  Now they helplessly spam their enviroment with it.

The more I think about it, the more my rage ebbs.  Even, God help me, at Joe Biden.  Poor little thing.  He is brain-damaged.  Imagine having a teeny-weeny Commodore 64 of a brain in a petaflop world and then catching a debilitating mental virus. 

This doesn’t change anything, of course.  We scream “Leave us alone!”, they say, 

So it’s a matter of survival.  Yes, we have to do to utopians what Dave did to HAL.  But anything more is excessive.

Posted in Militant Narcissim | 1 Comment

Has Coulter gone Crazy?

Ann Coulter spent an entire column defending Romneycare.

Apparently Mark Levin fisked it thoroughly in a 30 minute speech.  You’re missing the point, Mark.  The point is that his almost-convincing human disguise has been shucked off, revealing Mitt Romney’s true form.

All hail!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Uh-oh.

Got ten emails overnight, for the approval of new commenters.  I’ve only seen numbers like that during the Fukushima craze.  Maybe…a big-blogger gave an unsolicited link?  Except those ten comments were to ten different posts spanning years of time.

Gulp.  The Turing filters are being penetrated!  The personalized Spamophagic Shield™ is breached.  Bugs and worms are viruses are getting inside the ship!  And there can be only one (WORM)! 

Seriously, this could turn into a nightmare.  Whatever this new (Facebook-originated) twist is, WordPress doesn’t see it. 

…we cnonat fully love ourselves…I was shocked to learn that there is a lostl porn com… so much salt in there dainlscipg H2O… I scneod the ZZ plant… You have succinctly said in a few paragraphs what Rael and Erich Isaac took over 300 pages to say in their book THE COERCIVE UTOPIANS…

See?  Pure gibberish!  But it worked, because I accidently approved one of those ridiculous pseudo-random letterifications.  OTOH, this a taste of what those big-time bloggers deal with.  Making it easier to  remain satisfied as a teeny wee blogger.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Militant Narcissism

Marxism, Communism, National Socialism, fascism,  the United Nations, “environmentalism”.  And now, most recently, “fairness”.

What do they all have in common?  The root cause.  Each is driven by the same  subconscious belief.  It is an idea–utopianism–in three parts.  The unholy trinity of  Militant Narcissism:

You must do as I say because I know better and it is for the greater good.

It is the knowledge that everything isn’t perfect, the inchoate certainty that it should be…and the insanity that it can be.  All will be perfect, believes the utopian…when he controls all.

Everything else in modern ideology is rationalization.  Everything utopians say is a pack of lies created, told, and believed by them.  Militant Narcissism is like sand in an oyster.  It can’t just sit there, be seen for what it is.  How could they ever get their way then?

You must do as I say-

No, we don’t.

-because I know better-

No, you don’t.

-and it’s for the greater good.

No, it isn’t.

They come very close to saying exactly that.  But even in their mad self-worship they know it isn’t enough.  So they cast about for a problem–capitalists, das Judenkind, SUVs–to which they claim the solution.

And so utopianism inspires ideology as sand provokes a mollusc’s mucus.  But think of these beliefs as vehicles, not pearls.  With modern isms it doesn’t matter if you’re in a German sedan or a North Korean clown car.  Look under any hood and you’ll find the same infernal, implacable engine.

You must do as I say because I know better and it is for the greater good.

That is the utopians’ motive force.  As for the chassis, the wheels, the interior?  Trivia; nothing but taste and style.  Marx’s design is so popular that numerous vehicles are still built from it.   (And, as always, the next one will finally perform as advertised.)

These trappings are trivial because few Militant Narcissists care about them.  The journey isn’t about the vehicle, it’s about them and their fellow travellers.  It’s about…looking cool.  Cruising with the top down, checking yourselves out in the mirror, cooing over how amazingly gorgeous and wonderful you all are.

Pathetic, yes.  But that’s not the problem.  The problem isn’t the narcissism.  Narcissus didn’t care about your carbon footprint.  He didn’t trouble anyone but Nemesis.  But utopians differ from him the way a malignant tumor differs from a benign one.  They are militant.  They don’t just crave worship, they demand it. 

Their trinity of lies isn’t just hideous.  It is absurd.  There is not a single fact to support it.   Any understanding of history or humanity invalidates the theory.  And in practice utopianism murdered more people in one century than is recorded in all the ones before.  

Utopianism is beyond stupid and is denied by all existence.  And yet it thrives more than ever; it has become the dominant force of Western “Civilization”.   Why?  Because it is both virus and drug, contagion and addiction.  And there is no part of the mind it doesn’t infect and intoxicate.

You must do as I say, claims the id;

I know better, exclaims the ego;

For the greater good, declaims the superego.

The idea is impossible.  But it is also half Ebola virus, half crack cocaine.  And once contracted, utopianism is almost impossible to cure.  It is solipsistic; all outcomes reinforce it.  If you join the utopian, you prove him right.  If you resist…you show him where the imperfection is.

Narcissists feel their world should be flawless, but know it isn’t.  Militant Narcissists grit their teeth and say grimly, “oh, but it will be.”

Insane, yes.  But very powerful, and immune to outside pressure.  Utopians are like Terminators:  they don’t give up.  They barrel forward in their pride, oblivious to the dings and fenderbenders of their own mistakes.  When necessary they’ll toss on a fresh coat of paint, change license plates, visit the body shop.  It is only when the ride finally–inevitably–crashes and burns that they’ll consider changing vehicles.  To do otherwise is to admit mistake, which threatens their core belief.

There’s no better example of this madness than “environmentalism”.  These utopians had a very smooth, very profitable ride in the 1990′s when the license plate was “Global Warming”.  Then the wheels started coming off.  First, inconveniently, the globe stopped warming.  Of course, “that’s weather, not climate”.

But then the Hockey Stick was proven hokum, methodologies were proven skewed, data was shown to be cherry-picked.   Then the lies and false doctrines of their high priests were discovered and revealed to the world.

Time to change vehicles?  Not when you can just flip the license plate.  Though “Global Warming” is still used whenever a locale has a heat wave.  (That’s climate, not weather.)  Now utopians begin to favor ”Climate Change”.

Think about that.  The climate changes, it has always changed.  Even–gasp–prior to the internal combustion engine.  Now environmentalists want it to stop.  They seek to impose on nature the most unnatural change imaginable.

How will they react if you point this out?  The way you would if someone keyed your car.  “You scratched my paint!”  Very few of them will know how to repair the damage, but they all know who to blame.

But if enough people point out the flaw, utopians have to pretend to care.  They’ll send out credentialed repairmen to say, ”Obviously, we mean anthropogenic climate change”.  The implication being that you are ignorant and they are perfect.  Heads I win, tails you lose. 

Now utterly destroy their policies.  Say, ”then obviously we need to increase our carbon footprint whenever it gets colder”.  How do they react?  Exactly as you would if someone bashed in your windshield.  

Logic is useless against utopians because they do not reason, they rationalize.  They move away from conclusions, not toward them.  And as the immortal couplet says,

A man convinced against his will,

Is of the same opinion still.

This is what we are up against. 

On the one hand, today’s utopians aren’t as murderous as last century’s…yet.  On the other, terrifying hand…they are banding together.  Once upon a time, utopians opposed each other.  Hitler and Stalin played bumper cars with National Socialism and Communism, then tried to force each other off a cliff.   

But today’s utopians—the Ruling Class, the EU, the United Nations, environmentalists—are teaming up.  It can’t last, of course.  They must turn on each other as Hitler and Lenin did, as Lenin and Mao did to their own people.  But it seems treachery can wait until the common problem is eliminated.  Leaving no comfort for us, the common problem.

It’s time to acknowledge that utopians are impervious to logic and that acting otherwise just makes things worse.  You can no more reason with a Militant Narcissist than you can an oyster.  Yes, they are still human beings.  They are also sufferers and carriers of a contagious insanity that debilitates both mind and morality.  Even if you are immune, “debating” allows the infection of bystanders. 

We joke about the coming “Zombie Apocalypse”.  Meanwhile utopians control governments, schools, universities, communications, arts and entertainment.  The inmates have not only taken over the asylum and all the loudspeakers, they’ve also seized the children’s classrooms. 

is it any wonder that “Zombie Apocalypse” resonates so strongly?

You must do as I say because I know better and it is for the greater good.

The utopians came together under that banner and advanced upon us.  We fell back, and still do.  You can measure our ongoing retreat by every lost liberty.   

No more retreat!  Stop pretending the foe can be reasonable or that parley is possible.  Let us raise our own standard, reverse our retreat, force them to fall back.  Mad as they are, we can still fly a flag that they will understand.

No.  No.  No.

Posted in Militant Narcissim | 15 Comments

Tomorrow

The post’ll go up tomorrow,

Bet your bottom comment that tomorrow there’ll be blog.

Tomorrow, tomorrow!  I’ll blog ya, tomorrow,

It’s only a post…aaah…waaaaaaay!

Oh, and if you didn’t see xpat’s link to the WWII Facebook page in comments,  you should pay more attention.

Posted in Uncategorized | 10 Comments

Halloo out there!

I’m putting more time and effort into that essay than the usual post.  Hopefully it will be finished tomorrow.  But maybe not even then, it’s pretty long and I want it to flow nicely.

Anyway, still here.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Epiphanies are such a timesuck.

I’m not dumping that “disunion” speech on you guys after all.  It’s always painful to look at hours and hours of work and know it was wasted.  Ah well.  The perils of creative writing.

And of course “wasted” isn’t quite right.  Without the grunt work the epiphanies don’t come.  And when they do, you have to just go and explore them.

What’s the epiphany?  What came in the flash was the entire psychological framework of utopianism.  It is an uncomplicated, illuminating idea in three parts.  I’ve been writing about it all day, on pen and paper.  So the essay may not, probably won’t, go up tonight.  But soon…an initial exploration of Militant Narcissim.

(Sure hope that label hasn’t been taken yet!)

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Link found between liberals and liberalism?

Let’s go ahead and give 2012 a name:  “The Year of Living Ironically”. 

The great Taranto noted this hilarious item yesterday.  It’s amazing.  Look at the beautiful mess created just in the title…

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

…and the first line:

There’s no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb,

I’m having trouble following this reasoning…oh, wait  Ohmygod…is my IQ low?  Am I a bigot?  Am I a…a conservative?!

No, wait…ridiculous.  Impossible.  My IQ has been tested, it’s…not low.  And I could never be racist, due to my sapienism.  All puny humans are inferior, regardless of race, age, or gender.  (Don’t forget who came up with racism in the first place.)

Finally, I don’t even like “conservatives” because, yes, they’re pretty stupid.  (It’s due to most of them being Leviathan-worshipping socialist busybodies.)  

So…hello, Ms. Pappas.  You seem to like labelling things, and putting them in their place.  Please don’t try to label me, as I am beyond your comprehension.  Yes, there is a word for my thinking, but it’s nothing like your familar labels of“conservative” or “liberal”.  

The word for my thinking is…“thinking”. 

And I’m thinking about putting you in your place, Ms. Pappas.  Note how you began:  you simply enumerate and conflate five things: low IQ and dumbness, racism and prejudice, and…conservative beliefs.

Certainly IQ and dumbness are quite similar.  And racism and prejudice?  They’re as close as squares and rectangles.  Not only similar, but completely synonymous in a way. 

And since each sibling in each pair is related to the other sibling in the same pair, obviously conservatism is related to both members of both sets.  Ergo, conservatives are stupid bigots.  (They are much too dumb to follow this, of course.)

Ha ha, just kidding!  About her “logic”, that is. (Again, conservatives are generally  stupid.  Most of them, being Big Government Nanny-State buttinskis, are obviously not very bright.)

Ms. Pappas, “there’s no gentle way” to put this:  you are stupid.  See, in your first sentence you use both “racism” and “prejudice” to describe what dumb people fall into.  Why did you do that?  I didn’t prejudge: I searched the full article for a reason both the general case (“prejudice”) and a specific example (“racism”) were needed to make the same exact point.  You neglected to include one, Ms. Pappas.  Therefore…

you multiply entities needlessly.  

There is no defense for that.  None.  Not even “I was getting paid by the word!”  There are lots of ways to rip off your employer without muddying the intellectual waters. 

Also, apart from your assault on basic reasoning, a timeline or flowchart would have been nice.  It might have made the causality of the situation a bit clearer.  For example…and an intelligent person would know this to be important…does causality apply?

You imply it when you say that dumbness leads to “giving in” on racism.  The problem is, if asked “does racism tend to make people dumber?” you would reply in the affirmative.  (As would I.)  In which case we don’t have causality, we have a positive feedback loop.  (As you note with “a vicious cycle”.)

At least this provides the only interesting question from the entire article:  does Ms. Pappas believe conservatives have free will, or is she a political Calvinist

And Ms. Pappas, the next time you toss an intelligent and rational mind a mass of undefined terms…

Low-intelligence adults…socially conservative ideologies…political ideology… right-wing ideals…social conservatism…strict right-wing ideology…leftist hivemind…

 …kindly include the glossary.  (Oh, wait, that last buzzword was mine, wasn’t it?) 

I’ve finished grading this unintentional intelligence test, Ms. Pappas.  Alas.  You’re trapped in an epic Catch-22.  You are way too oblivious to understand your ignorance.  On the rare occasions when you or those researchers make brief sense, you go on to prove that you’re only Shakespeare-writing monkeys.

I realize you can’t see the central absurdity, due to that Catch-22 thing.  But you go on and on (and on) about dumb intolerant conservatives AND admit this:

 ”There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives and very intolerant liberals,”

So what’s the point?!  You’ve just invalidated everything said!  True, liberals can say, “Ha ha, on average we are smarter and more tolerant than conservatives”  But that means nothing on a case-by-case basis–which you acknowledge!  Therefore, your work ensures that the only liberals who will conclude they are smarter and more tolerant than conservatives are stupid, bigoted ones. 

Ha ha ha!  Actually, that is pretty funny.  Even awesome, in a way.  It’s like…a Perfect Storm of Stupidity.   

P.S.–Oh Ms. Kappas, if those researchers score more grant money?  They tested for a correlation between IQ and racism yet neglected to look for one between IQ and race.  Sloppy, very sloppy.

Obviously–if differences are found–stupid racists will draw wrong-headed conclusions.  Just as stupid and bigoted liberals are drawing idiotic conclusions from this current report.  But, assuming the results you just shared are valid, those on racial IQ would have to be, also.  Agreed?  

So.  We should expect ethnicities with below-average IQ to be more racist and  conservative than average, right?  And the further below average, the more bigoted and right-wing that race should be?   

Because that is what the research implies.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Look out below!

If your recent visits here have filled you with dread—oh God, wormme’s not posting because he’s polishing some gigantic thing to drop on our heads—then you know me well.

The problem (from my viewpoint) is that writing this ponderous prose has led to several ideas worth exploration in their own right.  Which would probably be more effective, too. 

So the best analog for what’s coming is that soon you’ll be crushed under a post the size of a horse.  I’ll then commence beating on select locations of its rapidly cooling corpse, with you still trapped beneath.

No thanks are necessary.  Or expected.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments